Did that time get finalized? I recall the doodle, but not seeing a final 
decision

On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Joshua Ladd <josh...@mellanox.com> wrote:

> These (and others) are exactly the issues we need to discuss with you guys 
> next week. 
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:29 PM
> To: Open MPI Developers
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] CM PML / OpenSHMEM
> 
> I think the issue that may have caused this was the need for a double modex 
> if the MPI layer selected a PML that used an MTL, and then the user provided 
> oshmem MCA params specifying they use the BTL-related SPML component. My 
> guess is that the defaults wound up creating that situation, which then led 
> to the clean abort.
> 
> Probably just a question of correctly setting defaults in the CM scenario.
> 
> On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Mellanox -
>> 
>> It looks like someone fixed the segfault when calling start_pes() when 
>> the CM PML is in use.  However, I'm not sure that a clean abort is 
>> much better.  With the proc tags code (in both the trunk and v1.7), 
>> there's no reason that you can't initialize both the btls and mtls.  
>> This may require some additional coding, but I think it should be 
>> doable.  I'm happy to help with advice / discuss implementation 
>> issues, but not supporting OpenSHMEM when the CM PML is in use is 
>> unacceptable and is, in my mind, a blocker for v1.7.
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> --
>> Brian W. Barrett
>> Scalable System Software Group
>> Sandia National Laboratories
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to