I don't have the doodle link, but fwiw, that time is fine with me. On Oct 29, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> What was the doodle link again? > > On Oct 29, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Joshua Ladd <josh...@mellanox.com> wrote: > >> I knew someone was going to ask :) >> >> Mike asked me to add 2pm EST to the times listed. Can you guys go and >> update those boxes? It looks like Thursday 2pm EST is our best shot at >> convergence. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain >> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:58 PM >> To: Open MPI Developers >> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] CM PML / OpenSHMEM >> >> Did that time get finalized? I recall the doodle, but not seeing a final >> decision >> >> On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Joshua Ladd <josh...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> >>> These (and others) are exactly the issues we need to discuss with you guys >>> next week. >>> >>> Josh >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph >>> Castain >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:29 PM >>> To: Open MPI Developers >>> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] CM PML / OpenSHMEM >>> >>> I think the issue that may have caused this was the need for a double modex >>> if the MPI layer selected a PML that used an MTL, and then the user >>> provided oshmem MCA params specifying they use the BTL-related SPML >>> component. My guess is that the defaults wound up creating that situation, >>> which then led to the clean abort. >>> >>> Probably just a question of correctly setting defaults in the CM scenario. >>> >>> On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwba...@sandia.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Mellanox - >>>> >>>> It looks like someone fixed the segfault when calling start_pes() >>>> when the CM PML is in use. However, I'm not sure that a clean abort >>>> is much better. With the proc tags code (in both the trunk and >>>> v1.7), there's no reason that you can't initialize both the btls and mtls. >>>> This may require some additional coding, but I think it should be >>>> doable. I'm happy to help with advice / discuss implementation >>>> issues, but not supporting OpenSHMEM when the CM PML is in use is >>>> unacceptable and is, in my mind, a blocker for v1.7. >>>> >>>> Brian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brian W. Barrett >>>> Scalable System Software Group >>>> Sandia National Laboratories >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devel mailing list >>>> de...@open-mpi.org >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> de...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> de...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
