On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> Hmmm....I see your point, but that means "1.9.5" would actually be lagging > *behind* "1.9.0", which also seems confusing. Usually, if we release a 1.9.0, > we concurrently roll the trunk to 2.0 to avoid the confusion. Is that not > adequate? (...or probably 2.1 :-) ) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/