On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Pritchard Jr., Howard <howa...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> I thought that 1.9.X release would at some point become the 2.0 release. > > I thought trunk would go to 2.1 once we branch 1.9 from trunk, no? Yeah, that's what I was implying. Sorry; I should have stated that directly. > What Jeff and I don't like is using 1.9 with implicit 0, then having > 1.9.1,1.9.2, etc. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
