On May 18, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Mark Santcroos <mark.santcr...@rutgers.edu> wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this to the wider community. > > I hope this will eventually address my main concern: the relatively old > versions that get deployed on HPC systems around the world, which I assume > is/was because of the "odd ;-)" numbering.
Yeah, we're hoping that, too. From what we've seen, the odd/even scheme does appear to be a prime reason that this happens. > What I didn't see in the doc, will you continue to work with two repo's or > will that change too? > (I found that confusing as a newcomer) Unfortunately, yes, we will keep 2 repos. Github doesn't let us have per-branch permissions -- having multiple repos is the only way to have strict control over who can push to release branches. Sad panda. If Github ever does enact per-branch permissions, we will happily squash back down to a single repo. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
