The patches for master/v2.x will be considerably larger (we have embraced at least a few of the C99 constructs quite a bit).
When is the EOL for SLES 10? Can you provide the doc links and an example of the link error that these patches are fixing? > On Aug 29, 2016, at 1:04 AM, C Bergström <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp> > wrote: >> Christopher, >> >> >> i made PR #1345 https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/1345 >> >> (there is no copyright in these files, let me know how i should credit >> pathscale (if you want that of course) > > I'm not sure that there is anything substantial enough to be > copyright. If the shoe was on the other foot I'd highly question > anyone who pushed for attribution on these patches. > >> >> >> this is basically your patch plus a few changes : you need to configure with >> '--disable-c99' if you are using pre C99 compiler. >> >> i noted these patches are for the v1.10 series. do you also expect v2.x (and >> master too ?) can be built with pre C99 compilers too ? > > If these style of changes are acceptable we'll do patches for all. > > Thanks for your help on this. I have a couple other small things I'm > hoping to get upstream after this. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
