FYI, C99 has been required since late 2012. Going through the commits there is
no way Open MPI could possibly compile with —std=c89 or —std=gnu99. Older
compilers require we add —std=c99 so we can not remove the configure check.
commit aebd1ea43237741bd29878604b742b14cc87d68b
Author: Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov>
Date: Wed Nov 14 04:52:39 2012 +0000
Per discussion we will now require a C99 compiant compiler.
This change will enable the use of C99 features in Open MPI; subobject
naming, restricted pointers, etc.
cmr:v1.7
This commit was SVN r27604.
-Nathan
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 8:18 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Brice !
>
> On Monday, August 29, 2016, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> s/June 2016/June 2006/ :)
>
> Anyway, it ended on July 31st based on https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/
>
> Brice
>
>
>
> Le 29/08/2016 16:03, Gilles Gouaillardet a écrit :
>> According to wikipedia, SLES 10 was released on June 2016, and is supported
>> for 10 years.
>> (SLES 12 is supported for 13 years, and I honestly do not know whether SLES
>> 10 support has been extended)
>> so SLES 10 might already been EOL
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> On Monday, August 29, 2016, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>> The patches for master/v2.x will be considerably larger (we have embraced at
>> least a few of the C99 constructs quite a bit).
>>
>> When is the EOL for SLES 10?
>>
>> Can you provide the doc links and an example of the link error that these
>> patches are fixing?
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 29, 2016, at 1:04 AM, C Bergström <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Christopher,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> i made PR #1345 https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/1345
>> >>
>> >> (there is no copyright in these files, let me know how i should credit
>> >> pathscale (if you want that of course)
>> >
>> > I'm not sure that there is anything substantial enough to be
>> > copyright. If the shoe was on the other foot I'd highly question
>> > anyone who pushed for attribution on these patches.
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> this is basically your patch plus a few changes : you need to configure
>> >> with
>> >> '--disable-c99' if you are using pre C99 compiler.
>> >>
>> >> i noted these patches are for the v1.10 series. do you also expect v2.x
>> >> (and
>> >> master too ?) can be built with pre C99 compilers too ?
>> >
>> > If these style of changes are acceptable we'll do patches for all.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help on this. I have a couple other small things I'm
>> > hoping to get upstream after this.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>> ______________________________
>> _________________
>> devel mailing list
>>
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
