Well, at least on my side I will not be able to provide the answer without legal involvement.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet < gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is there will be a vote, and the question will be > "Do we replace existing CLA with the new one ?" > If we vote to do so, then everyone will have to sign-off their commits, > regardless they previously had (or not) signed a CA > > Cheers, > > Gilles > > > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Pavel Shamis <pasharesea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> a. As a developer I think it is a good idea to lower barriers for code >> contribution. >> b. IANAL, but this "signature/certification" is not identical to the >> existing CLA, which I think has special statement about patents. Seems like >> the new model is a bit more relaxed. Does it mean that OMPI amends existing >> CLA ? If not - what is the relation between the two. Most likely existing >> member would have to take the "new" CLA to the legal for a review. >> >> -Pasha >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:38 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, my understanding is that unsystematic contributors will not have to >>> sign the contributor agreement, but instead will have to provide a signed >>> patch. >>> >>> George. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Pavel Shamis <pasharesea...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Does it mean that contributors don't have to sign contributor agreement >>>> ? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey Paulsen <gpaul...@us.ibm.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We have been discussing new Bylaws for the Open MPI Community. The >>>>> primary motivator is to allow non-members to commit code. Details in the >>>>> proposal (link below). >>>>> >>>>> Old Bylaws / Procedures: https://github.com/open-mpi/om >>>>> pi/wiki/Admistrative-rules >>>>> >>>>> New Bylaws proposal: https://github.com/open-mpi/om >>>>> pi/wiki/Proposed-New-Bylaws >>>>> >>>>> Open MPI members will be voting on October 25th. Please voice any >>>>> comments or concerns. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> devel mailing list >>>>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org >>>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devel mailing list >>>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org >>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org >>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
