Hi Milan, You are absolutely right.
We need to cut down a client release including all (and others) bugfixes. Even if this means a broken server-package (which by the way is fully working on branches but require trunk merge). I'll find some time this week-end to send an email to the list for review with the entire set of fixes expected to be applied. As it may take some time, any help would be appreciated with this. Finally, I seriously consider 0.12 to include the thread safe compatibility we discussed and tested. Milan, I assume you have the most tested version of this patch. Am I correct? Kind Regards, Julien. On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 09:53 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi team, > I would like to propose a release of OpenChange. Based on > http://www.openchange.org/ the 0.11 had been released on Thursday, 07 > July 2011, which is quite long time ago. There landed some critical > fixes meanwhile, and there are also many pending patches in the tracker > (I can name those mine, though you may find more, I believe). And, you > know, there is quite quiet on OpenChange side these days. The current > svn master works fine with alpha17 of samba4 too (with one build break > patch, also available in the tracker). > > Could you do an 0.12 release, please? > Thanks and bye, > Milan > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
