Am Do 19. März 2009 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > On Thursday 19 March 2009 14:39:19 Sven Klomp wrote: > > On Thursday 19 March 2009 14:05:05 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > > I wonder why it takes a string as opposed to a double. > > > > > > If you think double is more appropriate, feel free to open a bug report > > > (trac.fso) > > > > Done. > > > > Maybe it is the wrong mailinglist. > > [email protected] would fit most. > > > However, I wonder if an API for the RTC > > is planed that takes care of multiple wake up times? Until now, I have to > > take care if another application set the time already... > > RTC is probably going to stay like that, since it's a low level interface. The > big picture is that the (higher level) PIM service would handle this, e.g. > once it knows about all your appointments, it can always compute the next > alarm that is due and program the RTC accordingly.
Nope, has to be done by some middleware. There might be RTC-alarms from other sources than just PIM. (e.g. GPS, bat management etc pp) I suggest patching cron & at, as it seems the most natural interface for RTC-alarm. /j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
