On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 17:59 +0100, Joerg Reisenweber wrote: > Am Do 19. März 2009 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > On Thursday 19 March 2009 14:39:19 Sven Klomp wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 March 2009 14:05:05 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > > > I wonder why it takes a string as opposed to a double. > > > > > > > > If you think double is more appropriate, feel free to open a bug report > > > > (trac.fso) > > > > > > Done. > > > > > > Maybe it is the wrong mailinglist. > > > > [email protected] would fit most. > > > > > However, I wonder if an API for the RTC > > > is planed that takes care of multiple wake up times? Until now, I have to > > > take care if another application set the time already... > > > > RTC is probably going to stay like that, since it's a low level interface. > The > > big picture is that the (higher level) PIM service would handle this, e.g. > > once it knows about all your appointments, it can always compute the next > > alarm that is due and program the RTC accordingly. > > Nope, has to be done by some middleware. There might be RTC-alarms from other > sources than just PIM. (e.g. GPS, bat management etc pp) > I suggest patching cron & at, as it seems the most natural interface for > RTC-alarm.
The handling of multiple alarms is already implemented as: org.freesmartphone.Time.Alarm (http://git.freesmartphone.org/?p=specs.git;a=blob_plain;f=html/org.freesmartphone.Time.Alarm.html;hb=HEAD) I don't know of anything using that interface, though :/ Jan
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
