On 17/05/2009, at 4:39 AM, Leonti Bielski wrote: > Yeap, and this is a shame. > FSO is great as it is - with more love (especially rewriting > essential parts into Vala) it could be the base for all Open Source > telephony. > I just don't get it. > But at least FSO is independent! :)
It's about control. Do you think Nokia and Intel will allow someone else to control their telephony stack development? It's also about regulatory commissions, certifications and being able to get operators to buy into the software. Besides, how do you know FSO was the first being developed? What I don't get is why people think it's bad to have more than one open source 'solution'. If reinventing the wheel was bad, we wouldn't have KDE, gnome, gtk, and even python, FSO and Linux, for that matter. Reinventing the wheel, is _good_. > > Leonti > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller <[email protected] > > wrote: > > Am 16.05.2009 um 16:29 schrieb Nicolas Dufresne: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > It's seems that Nokia and Intel have decided to adopt FSO way of > > driving > > telephone. I guess we already have a good DBus API that could be use > > as > > base for this project if we want. > > To me it looks as if they already started to reinvent the wheel... > > Or am I wrong? > > > http://ofono.org/ > > > > Best regards, > > Nicolas Dufresne > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
