Hi Henning, not sure if we can say that sf has any policy to push away some project (I see no logic in this, to be honest :) ). I guess the explanation is that as larger you are as project, as higher is the probability to find out something not working properly with sf ;).
Bottom line - even if having your own infrastructure sounds appealing, I do not consider it: first, as Henning said it is about resources; second is about people who really know how to admin and finally I do not thing that if we do it will automatically be better than SF. Mainly we have the same problem as say do when come to admin work - available cycles.... So, I would say let SF take care of this. regards, bogdan Henning Westerholt wrote: >> Anyway, the point was really more "gee, SF.net sucks even more than I >> thought". I must say not accepting the SSH key when the password is >> expired is incredibly stupid. When will they stop... >> > > Hm, its probably part of their strategy. Providing a service just good enough > for most of the projects, to 'motivate' the more successful ones to go away, > as their need way to much resources. > > I would love to replace the SF svn access and the bugtracker with a own > installation, for example with 'trac'. But lets wait, the pain will continue > to grow.. ;-) > > Cheers, > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
