On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > not sure if we can say that sf has any policy to push away some project > (I see no logic in this, to be honest :) ). I guess the explanation is > that as larger you are as project, as higher is the probability to find > out something not working properly with sf ;).
Hi Bogdan, ok, this is more or less the same i said. ;-) > Bottom line - even if having your own infrastructure sounds appealing, I > do not consider it: first, as Henning said it is about resources; second > is about people who really know how to admin and finally I do not thing > that if we do it will automatically be better than SF. Mainly we have > the same problem as say do when come to admin work - available cycles.... > > So, I would say let SF take care of this. And this is also my opinion, until something changes in our resources situation. Regards, Henning _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
