Well, and the gains is more security, should I understand?

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org>wrote:

> On amd64, the perf hit will be minimal.  On x86 it will be substantial.
>
>
> On 11/09/2012 02:08 PM, Steven Cristian wrote:
>
>> You sure there won't be any optimization of the code breakage and no
>> performance cost? I'm kinda scared of hardening almost all packages of the
>> system
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Joost 
>> Ruis<joost.ruis@sabayonlinux.**org<joost.r...@sabayonlinux.org>
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Fine with me.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Mitch Harder
>>> <mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org**>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> We need to decide on our next step for rolling out hardened Sabayon.
>>>>
>>>> My proposal would be
>>>>
>>>> (1) Add all the @system packages to the white list and rebuild them.
>>>> (2) Add Xorg to the white list during a time period we'll be able to
>>>> react to any issues.
>>>>
>>>> If no issues,
>>>>
>>>> (3) From here, go from white-listing to black-listing.
>>>>
>>>> As far as it goes, I've done several systems on Hardened now, and I've
>>>> never had any run-time package problems resulting from just letting
>>>> everything go hardened as they're rebuilt.  I've had a very few build
>>>> problems, but it has been a while since I've ran into any of those.
>>>>
>>>> But I think it would be best to flip the white-list/black-list switch
>>>> with some lead time before the next freeze.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
> E-Mail    : bluen...@gentoo.org
> GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
> GnuPG ID  : D0455535
>
>
>


-- 
Lead-Developer at Project Rogentos (Romanian Gentoo Operating System)
GNU/Linux. Based on Sabayon and Gentoo Linux, Rogentos tends to offer
support mainly for all Romanian Linux users and entrepreneurs which seek to
learn an open and free system based on true values :)
http://rogentos.ro
www.facebook.com/RogentosLinux
https://plus.google.com/106559511636021124919/ Google+


Reply via email to