Do we keep daily snapshots from the chroot? I mean, can we easily revert if we decide bumping GCC wasn't such a great plan?!
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Ettore Di Giacinto <mud...@sabayonlinux.org > wrote: > Before going for that road, I'd like to see the GCC bump using a custom > eclass forked from toolchain one (easier to distinguish changes then) > > Il mar 30 mag 2017, 14:07 Joost Ruis <joost.r...@sabayon.org> ha scritto: > >> @Fabio. Hmm this might be a good idea! >> >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Fabio Erculiani < >> fabio.erculi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Should we create a new branch for this? Sounds like a very disruptive >>> change. >>> >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Jerrod Frost <piroisl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> When is this going to happen? It's like to see this move forward. >>>> Mudler, any objections? >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017, 5:50 AM Geaaru <gea...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I push last fix fo set gcc profile on sys-devel/gcc package. I test >>>>> compilation on a fresh sabayon image and it seems work fine. >>>>> >>>>> Can we proceed with merge pull request and try to start compilation of >>>>> gcc-5.4.0-r3? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 22:08 +0000, Jerrod Frost wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm prepared for breakage in limbo. When the war begins let me know :) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM Geaaru <gea...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I confirm that there is a lot of work on upgrade to gcc-5.4.0 (a lot >>>>> of packages to recompile) but FWIS could optimize a lot of package and >>>>> there are packages like for example mongodb-3.4 that need a >=gcc-5.x. >>>>> >>>>> Gcc-5.4.0 is now stable on gentoo and could be a good idea plan an >>>>> upgrade. >>>>> >>>>> I test compilation of ebuild sys-devel/base-gcc and sys-devel/gcc for >>>>> both amd64 and arm and installation is been complete correctly. I think >>>>> that there is only a fix... avoid set of gcc-5 at the end of base-gcc and >>>>> move it at the end of the installation of sys-devel/gcc. >>>>> >>>>> My cent >>>>> G. >>>>> >>>>> On May 4, 2017 22:15, "Mitch Harder" <mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm seeing some discussion about updating our Sabayon gcc ebuilds to >>>>> version 5.4.0 >>>>> >>>>> You guys probably already knew this, but just in case this slipped >>>>> through the cracks, I want to make sure everyone is fore-warned that >>>>> this will be a really big chunk of work once we start using GCC-5.4.0 >>>>> on our packages. >>>>> >>>>> At a minimum, we need to rebuild every package that uses C++ since the >>>>> ABI changes. >>>>> >>>>> We may decide to rebuild everything just to insure consistency. >>>>> >>>>> Reading some discussions on the Gentoo M/L, mixing GCC 4.9.4 and 5.4.0 >>>>> is discouraged by several developers, but there do seem to be a few >>>>> who think it can be managed. >>>>> >>>>> The Gentoo news item for this upgrade recommends using a >>>>> revdep-rebuild command to identify the affected C++ packages: >>>>> >>>>> revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude gcc >>>>> >>>>> When I ran this on my systems, I quickly discovered that this method >>>>> will not discern packages that have already been rebuilt with >>>>> GCC-5.4.0. It just gives me the same list every time. >>>>> >>>>> So, if we encounter build issues (and we almost certainly will since >>>>> some packages will attempt to build out of order), we'll have to come >>>>> up with our own system for keeping up with what's been rebuilt, and >>>>> what packages remain. >>>>> >>>>> I apologize if this has already been discussed, but I hadn't run >>>>> across any discussion on GCC 5.x, and wanted to make sure. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mitch... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio Erculiani >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- > > Regards, > Ettore Di Giacinto - Sabayon Project Lead > > > > >
