Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes: > I hesitate to do it because you can get into BRANCH_ROUTE from a > FAILURE_ROUTE - and add_rr_param() does not work inside a FAILURE_ROUTE > (mainly due the static variable I mentioned before) - I need to work a > bit on it.
ok, i didn't know that. it may then be better to wait until add_rr_param can also be called from FAILURE_ROUTE. > you mean flags per contact/branch after location lookup? we already have > them..... so if i test registrar/nat_flag in BRANCH_ROUTE, i correctly get the nat status of that branch? > I see no problems (conflicts or duplicity) with the patch, so I guess is > ok to commit it. it looks nicer in the code if i don't need to first call add_rr_param, but i don't think it is necessary to apply the patch if there is no performance advantage over first calling add_rr_param. -- juha _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
