Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Andrey Mirkin wrote:
> > This patchset introduces kernel based checkpointing/restart as it is
> > implemented in OpenVZ project. This patchset has limited functionality and
> > are able to checkpoint/restart only single process. Recently Oren Laaden
> > sent another kernel based implementation of checkpoint/restart. The main
> > differences between this patchset and Oren's patchset are:
> >
> > * In this patchset checkpointing initiated not from the process
> > (right now we do not have a container, only namespaces), Oren's patchset
> > performs checkpointing from the process context.
> >
> > * Restart in this patchset is initiated from process, which restarts a new
> > process (in new namespaces) with saved state. Oren's patchset uses the same
> > process from which restart was initiated and restore saved state over it.
> >
> > * Checkpoint/restart functionality in this patchset is implemented as a
> > kernel
> > module
>
> why ? Do we really think that C/R implementations will be so different that
> we will need C/R ops to support all of them ? I imagine that there could be
> different models :
At the mini-summit two reasons were brought up to make it a module:
1. So sysadmins worried about security implications can
completely unload the module
2. So developers can unload and reload the module while
testing.
> 1. brute force : dump it all and kill
> 2. incremental
> 3. live migration
> ...
Actually I don't think we expected to use different implementations for
those.
> But I see all of them really tied to the kernel internals.
>
> The first issues I see with this direction are some EXPORT_SYMBOL() that
> would
> be useless without a module.
>
> > As checkpointing is initiated not from the process which state should be
> > saved
> > we should freeze a process before saving its state. Right now Container
> > Freezer
> > from Matt Helsley can be used for this.
>
> OK that's integrated and Daniel's tools :
>
> http://lxc.cvs.sourceforge.net/lxc/
>
> one more reason to work on integration :)
>
> C.
>
>
> > This patchset introduce only a concept how kernel based
> > checkpointing/restart
> > can be implemented and are able to checkpoint/restart only a single process
> > with simple VMAs.
> >
> > I've tried to split my patchset in small patches to make review more easier.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Containers mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
