On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Eichinger <thomas.eichin...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > >> On 06 Feb 2015, at 09:36, Ludwig Ortmann <ludwig.ortm...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Oleg Hahm wrote: >>> Am Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:09:52PM -0800 schrieb Adam Hunt: >>>> There's already a driver for for Atmel's AT86RF231 in the tree and while >>>> the AT86RF230 on the Raven boards are nearly the same the 230 lacks a >>>> couple minor features, namely a crypto processor and RNG. So, the RF link >>>> would be wide open but for experimentation and learning sacrifices are >>>> often necessary. >>> >>> As far as I know there were some considerations and work done towards a >>> generic AT86RF23x or even AT86RF2xx driver. Thomas, am I right? >> >> Yes, I'm working on that (almost done). > Yes, I will take up work on this again next week, as we have a stable netdev > interface by today. >
That's great news! I have seen some compatibility issues when I have been attempting to use the 231 driver for the 212B (sub-GHz band), but I assume this is because every limit etc. is configured to work with the 2.4 GHz register values on the 231. BR, Joakim _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
