Hi, Yes, I think (and wrote in a separate mail in this thread already): working groups for different distribution implementations should be created by people who are interested in those. If it helps preventing confusion I'm happy with renaming the first iteration to whatever you suggest, or "OTA/FAF" (firmware activation framework).
Cheers, Ludwig Am 24. März 2015 19:10:36 MEZ, schrieb Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr>: >Hi Ludwig! > >> yes, we agreed that in order to get software updates we need a >foundation >> for activating new firmware images first. >> The working assumption for the first incarnation/iteration of this is >that >> an image has been saved to some memory of the device already. > >Okay, basically my question was: do the OTA task force wants to work on >the >actual update distribution mechanisms (including security) in a second >step or >would it make more sense trying to charter a task force that works on >this in >parallel? (If the latter, I would recommend to rename it.) > >Cheers, >Oleg _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
