Hi Baptiste, yeah in that case multicast seems like the best thing to go. But how about using an actual global address then: (ff:1e::1 e.g.; 10 flag = non-permanent, e scope = global). With the hint by Kaspar I was able to get the pings through the interface, but apparently the border router does not forward the address. Will investigate.
Cheers, Martine 2016-05-12 11:39 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet <bapcle...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Martine, what I want: > My set up: > |Linux + RIOT BORDER ROUTER| > > |RIOT gnrc_networking A| > |RIOT gnrc_networking B| > |RIOT gnrc_networking C| > |RIOT gnrc_networking D| > > I run a program on Linux which sends some UDP data to A B C D nodes. > I want to use multicast in my program instead of one board by one bard > Is it clearer? > > Cheers, > > 2016-05-11 21:55 GMT+02:00 Kaspar Schleiser <kas...@schleiser.de>: > > Hey, > > > > On 05/11/2016 09:42 PM, Martine Lenders wrote: > >> (2) I'm not sure you add multicast routing entries this way in Linux. > > > > You don't. If really desired, you have to use the "local" routing table. > > > > # ip -6 route list table local > > > > Kaspar > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@riot-os.org > > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > -- > Baptiste > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
