Hi *, I am working on the pm (power management) module of RIOT. Can anyone tell me why pm_reboot is (often) part of this module?
If no one votes against it, I woud like to move *pm_reboot()* to a dedicated module, in order to have a reboot_fallback module as we have planned for pm_fallback and additionally common CPUs can implement specific reboot functions if required. Is 'reboot' a good module name? Or should we name it pm_reboot_fallback (prefix it with pm)? Background: atmega_common defines a pm_reboot, but no power management by default. Therefore using pm_fallback is not possible and we would have to duplicate existing code (bad idea!). Best, Robert -- Robert Hartung, M.Sc. Technische Universität Braunschweig Institut für Betriebssysteme und Rechnerverbund Mühlenpfordtstr. 23, Raum 115 38106 Braunschweig Fon: +49 (531) 391 - 3264 Fax: +49 (531) 391 - 5936 E-Mail: hart...@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
