I have tested hello.exe on RPi2, BBB, and Zedboard and all are OK. Please push.
I will run the full test suite after. Thank you for the fix. Chris On 26/7/19 4:17 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > There are no known ARMv7-M chips with a dual lockstep mode. > > Update #3773. > --- > bsps/arm/shared/start/start.S | 13 +------------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/bsps/arm/shared/start/start.S b/bsps/arm/shared/start/start.S > index 80b7d44dbe..a7fd7eda62 100644 > --- a/bsps/arm/shared/start/start.S > +++ b/bsps/arm/shared/start/start.S > @@ -369,12 +369,7 @@ bsp_start_vector_table_end: > > _start: > > -#ifdef BSP_START_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION > - bl bsp_start_init_registers_core > -#endif > - > -#ifdef ARM_MULTILIB_VFP > -#ifdef ARM_MULTILIB_HAS_CPACR > +#if defined(ARM_MULTILIB_VFP) && defined(ARM_MULTILIB_HAS_CPACR) > /* > * Enable CP10 and CP11 coprocessors for privileged and user mode in > * CPACR (bits 20-23). Ensure that write to register completes. > @@ -387,12 +382,6 @@ _start: > isb > #endif > > -#ifdef BSP_START_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION > - bl bsp_start_init_registers_vfp > -#endif > - > -#endif /* ARM_MULTILIB_VFP */ > - > ldr sp, =_ISR_Stack_area_end > ldr lr, =.Lstart_hook_0_done + 1 > b bsp_start_hook_0 > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel