On 10/9/20 9:34 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 10/09/2020 12:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 09/09/2020 17:28, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>>>> I am not sure if the 5 branch in the rtems-libbsd.git repo is right and >>>>>> if it >>>>>> should be made from the 5-freebsd-12 branch? I feel it is currently >>>>>> confusing >>>>>> but either way it has issues. >>>>>> >>>>> Maybe, we can continue to discuss that outside of this patch set? Renaming >>>>> a branch later should be no trouble. >>>>> An option could be to rename 5 -> 5-freebsd-master, then the mapping >>>>> between rtems and FreeBSD would always be explicit. >>>> Yes this is one Joel mentioned the other day and I missed the context in >>>> relation to these patches. I think moving 5 to 5-freebsd-master makes >>>> sense. >>>> What we have is confusing. >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Would be good to get Christian or Sebastian to comment/agree :) >>> >> Yes, the branch name "5" makes no sense. It should be "5-freebsd-master". > Actually, I think we should delete this branch or is there someone willing to > maintain it?
If that is the case why have 5-freebsd-12? Why not make it 5 and then all the repos are the same? > The libbsd branch recommended for RTEMS 5 is 5-freebsd-12. Do we maintain FreeBSD related fixes off the freebsd-12 release branch only? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel