On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>
> <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
> It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
>
>
> Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
related to
> giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose
that will
> show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
>
> Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you
removed?
We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why
don't
we record the tier status in the BSP items?
That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.
Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a
ticket for it.
I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449
Why does this work?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel