On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>> wrote: > > On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > BSP builder has 81 failures. :( > It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist. > > > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was related to > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose that will > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf. > > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you removed? We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why don't we record the tier status in the BSP items? That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a ticket for it.
I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449 Why does this work? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
