On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:


On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:

    On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:

    > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
    > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
    <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>
    > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
    <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
    >
    >     On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
    >
    >     > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
    >     It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
    >
    >
    > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
    related to
    > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose
    that will
    > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
    >
    > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you
    removed?
    We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why
    don't
    we record the tier status in the BSP items?


That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.

Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a ticket for it.

I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system:

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449

Why does this work?

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to