On 10/3/21 3:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:58 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:28 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vi...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vi...@rtems.org> >>> wrote: >>> In this proposed set of patches, I have removed telnetd from RTEMS and >>> have placed it in the net-legacy repo, it seems like libbsd uses >>> telnetd as well. Do we want to keep it in RTEMS and remove it from the >>> legacy net repo? There are checks in for RTEMS_NETWORKING in telnetd, >>> to add rtems_bsdnet.h, how do we want to deal with that? In the legacy >>> repo, we can just remove these checks and let them build. >> >> >> Move it and remove rtems networking conditional. Freezes it with legacy >> stack. >> >> Just my opinion >> > Is there a different telnetd in libbsd?
Yes ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/rtemsbsd/telnetd > The longer term pseudo-goal of being able to (potentially) build > multiple networking stacks and pick which one to link against may also > be a consideration at this stage. Are there issues? If there are issues do we know what they are? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
