On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:56 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 10/3/21 3:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:58 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:28 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vi...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vi...@rtems.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> In this proposed set of patches, I have removed telnetd from RTEMS and > >>> have placed it in the net-legacy repo, it seems like libbsd uses > >>> telnetd as well. Do we want to keep it in RTEMS and remove it from the > >>> legacy net repo? There are checks in for RTEMS_NETWORKING in telnetd, > >>> to add rtems_bsdnet.h, how do we want to deal with that? In the legacy > >>> repo, we can just remove these checks and let them build. > >> > >> > >> Move it and remove rtems networking conditional. Freezes it with legacy > >> stack. > >> > >> Just my opinion > >> > > Is there a different telnetd in libbsd? > > Yes ... > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/rtemsbsd/telnetd > This seems to include rtems/telnetd.h Does the libbsd telnetd depend on the cpukit/telnetd?
> > The longer term pseudo-goal of being able to (potentially) build > > multiple networking stacks and pick which one to link against may also > > be a consideration at this stage. > > Are there issues? If there are issues do we know what they are? > > Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel