On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:28 PM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes I have. But wondering how to run it with the given configuration I saw in > this thread(https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-October/062770.html). >
If you download/copy the configuration into a cfg file, then you can use the examples from https://github.com/uncrustify/uncrustify#running-the-program and attempt to run it on some files within rtems.git/cpukit/score/src would be my suggestion. > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:37 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Ida, >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 7:36 AM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > Please do you mind telling me how to run uncrustify with the given >> > configuration with any sample file? >> >> What have you tried? Any directions followed/attempted or notes that >> you have taken would be helpful. >> >> I guess all the info that you should need is in Uncrustify's readme >> file. https://github.com/uncrustify/uncrustify >> >> Did you successfully compile uncrustify tool? >> >> > I'm a bit stuck. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ida. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:34 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:28 PM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hello, >> >> > So I have gone through this configuration file and I think I'm getting >> >> > it. However I'm a bit lost in the reading the messages in the thread. >> >> > Do you mind explaining? Or we can start talking about a way forward. >> >> > Also can you help me with some steps on how to test this by myself if >> >> > possible? >> >> > >> >> >> >> It may be easier if you go "up" a level to see the full thread >> >> context: >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-October/thread.html#62769 >> >> Then you can go through the messages non-linearly. Right now, the >> >> basic idea is to follow the steps outlined in the open project ticket. >> >> I think Christian has summarized it nicely in his recent email [1]: "I >> >> think the contributions from this project that would add value would >> >> be: >> >> 1. Finding a tool and a configuration that can do an RTEMS style or an >> >> acceptable close one. >> >> 2. Adding a "check-style" target to our build system. >> >> 3. Maybe add some kind of script similar to Linux "checkpatch.pl" that >> >> could check whether patches would need changes _before_ they are >> >> applied. >> >> " >> >> >> >> The proposal preparation phase should work through identifying the >> >> options and pros/cons for different tools while preparing a plan for >> >> how to integrate style checks in 2, 3 and thinking through the coding >> >> tasks for the summer. >> >> >> >> Getting the style checking tool's configuration to match with the >> >> RTEMS style will be some effort, and testing it out and submitting >> >> some patches based on it could be a good proposal activity also to >> >> build some confidence about the tools that will be used. >> >> >> >> We also have some Python style guidelines that might be worth >> >> addressing. Those are harder maybe, since the style refactoring might >> >> be challenging to review for correctness. >> >> >> >> For getting started, I would recommend that you try running uncrustify >> >> with the given configuration on some files in RTEMS, see what it >> >> results in. Play around. >> >> >> >> [1] https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-March/065547.html >> >> >> >> -Gedare >> >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Ida >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:39 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> See the related thread, and we'll have to discuss how to move forward. >> >> >> The existing approach provides an uncrustify script: >> >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-October/062769.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:47 PM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hello everyone, >> >> >> > This ticket(https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860) was proposed to me >> >> >> > and I'm interested in it for GSoC. >> >> >> > The first task there is to find a code checker or formater that can >> >> >> > produce results that match the RTEMS coding conventions. It also >> >> >> > made mention some tools have been discussed in the past. Please I >> >> >> > will love suggestions on possible tools I could use to achieve this. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Cheers, >> >> >> > Ida. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > devel mailing list >> >> >> > devel@rtems.org >> >> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel