On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:19 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello Kinsey, > > why don't you use a fatal error extension for this? You can save all the > processor state to a structure and use it to jump to previous or next > instruction it if needed in a custom fatal error handler which deals > with RTEMS_FATAL_EXCEPTION. I think libdebugger uses this approach. > +1
This is otherwise a major overhaul/addition to the CPU port requirements. I'd lean in favor of adding any CPU_* API that is necessary to support vectoring from an exception to a signal. I don't think we can make this kind of intrusive modification to basic interrupt handling capabilities across all ports easily. Some of that code is old and very stable. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
