On 4/5/2022 8:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04/05/2022 09:11, Chris Johns wrote: >>> I updated the RTEMS 7 tools to use the GCC 12 release branch with a gcov >>> back >>> port. You can test GCC 12 with a local patch for RTEMS 6: >>> >>> diff --git a/rtems/config/6/rtems-default.bset >>> b/rtems/config/6/rtems-default.bset >>> index 731c9d8..381f916 100644 >>> --- a/rtems/config/6/rtems-default.bset >>> +++ b/rtems/config/6/rtems-default.bset >>> @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ devel/gmp-6.2.1 >>> tools/rtems-gdb-11.2 >>> >>> tools/rtems-binutils-2.38 >>> -tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head >>> +tools/rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head >>> tools/rtems-tools-6 >> Ah ok and thanks. I will take a look and report back. It will take a couple >> of >> days for me to work through this. > > Ok, thanks. > >> >> It would be nice to be able to handle this without changing anything. > > I can commit this change if it helps.
This assumes it is ok and I prefer we get posted test results before such a change. Until we have this we need to wait until we all each do a level of testing we are happy with. A solution that lets us test would steam line this. I think this is a use case where something added to the RSB may be required to make this easier. For example logic in a bset file would be nice. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel