Sorry for that. I wanted a review for this so that's why included the gist too. I think instead of writing as a patch, I'll be using review. Thank you for the info.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022, 8:14 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 22/7/2022 12:42 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 22/7/2022 1:55 am, Noor Aman wrote: > >> A brief gist of what i found compatible with the older code > >> ---COMPATIBLE HEADER--- > >> - BCM2835 timer > >> - GPIO > >> - AUX > >> - GPU timer > >> ---DIDNT CHECK--- > >> - SPI > >> - I2C > >> ---MINOR CHNAGE--- > >> - IRQ > >> - FIQ > >> ---NOT SURE ABOUT--- > >> - Watchdog > >> - Power management > >> - Mailbox register > >> > >> I didnt get any info about power management or watchdog or mailboxes. > (It isnt > >> in the BCM2835 Documention too I think??) > >> > >> And to answer your question Alan about if the Aarch64 would require a > DTB or not > >> which you asked me quite earlier. I can say now, you dont, because > every address > >> is defined here already so no need for the DTB. > > > > Is this a commit message? > > > > Is not think a conversation suites a commit message. > > Sorry, that should read "I do not think ..." > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel