On 31/3/2023 2:55 am, Alex White wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> On 30/3/2023 12:26 pm, Sam Price wrote: >>> Same IP as the regular KCU105. >>> The current uart ip is dependent on the fpga. >>> I don't believe this modifies the kcu105 bsp, but allows other bsps to >>> support up to 4 uarts. >> >> I am not sure if this patch is OK. If the UART driver is needed for a console >> does that limits how it's configuration can be handled? If so that means the >> patch is OK. Adding options for a user's custom IP is questionable. > > This patch allows the user to use multiple instances of the same UART IP (AXI > UART Lite v2.0) which is currently the only IP supported by the BSP.
What happens if a user needs more than 4 ports? I was discussing such a project recently with someone and Microblaze may be an option? I do not have a better solution at the moment so I am just understand the what we accept and why plus how we manage it. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
