On 18/9/2023 10:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17.09.23 00:58, Chris Johns wrote: >>> There are also no test cases for this function. >>> Without test cases it is easy to break something without knowing it. >> The libdl test cases have been updated to reference TLS newlib variables to >> test >> this. Is that enough? If not what would you like to see? > > These higher level tests are all right, however, it would be nice to have also > lower level tests which just check a particular function like > rtems_rtl_tls_get_base(). This would improve the maintainability of this > stuff. > You would not have to debug a tool generated code to figure out what is wrong.
This makes sense. I will think about a suitable test. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
