On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> What is the family member of struct sockaddr_storage then?
> This could probably be worked around by changing line 338 from:
> ciptr->family = sockname.ss_family;
> to something like:
> ciptr->family = ((struct sockaddr *)&sockname)->sa_family;
/usr/include/bits/sockaddr.h:
#define __SOCKADDR_COMMON(sa_prefix) \
sa_family_t sa_prefix##family
/usr/include/bits/socket.h:
struct sockaddr_storage
{
__SOCKADDR_COMMON (__ss_); /* Address family, etc. */
__ss_aligntype __ss_align; /* Force desired alignment. */
char __ss_padding[_SS_PADSIZE];
};
> > ../../lib/xtrans/Xtranssock.c: At top level:
> > ../../lib/xtrans/Xtranssock.c:1315: `MAXHOSTNAMELEN' undeclared here (not in a
> > function)
>
> Is there some other file that needs to be included to define this?
> (It's in <netdb.h> on Solaris, and <asm/param.h> on RedHat 8.)
<rpc/types.h> on RedHat 6.2, 7.3 and 8.0 (I don't have access to RH9 yet)
<asm/param.h> on RedHat 7.3 and 8.0, but not in 6.2.
Value 64 in all cases.
> Or perhaps NI_MAXHOST would be a better choice since it's defined by
> RFC 2133.
NI_MAXHOST is in /usr/include/netdb.h on RedHat 6.2, 7.3 and 8.0.
Value 1025 on all three. Do the extra 961 bytes matter ?
I don't know that IPv6 actually works with RH6.2;
maybe we would be better off disabling it rather than fixing it ?
Is anyone using IPv6 on other Linux 2.2 distributions ?
--
Andrew C Aitchison
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
