--- "Sottek, Matthew J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Will there be open discussion of what makes up Xaa? I know > >> you have already have a working design but rather than accept > >> major changes wholesale can we discuss the finer points before > >> they become defacto-accepted. > >> > >> -Matt > > > > It depends what you'd like to discuss. I already have a > >working implementation. It does not preclude usage of the > >old XAA. A driver can use either one. Nobody has to > >touch old drivers if they don't want to. > > I'd like to discuss the design details. Why don't you send the > relevant parts of the header to the list for discussion before > you commit it? Lets face it, once the code is committed there > is not going to be as much room for change. If Xaa is being > replaced then it seems fitting that everyone have a chance to > review and comment on the design before it is committed. >
good alpha channel support would be nice too, although that might require some other changes. Alex [snip] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
