On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:55:58AM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>But isn't it better to move forward than backwards ? >> >>If the result is no better, then we need to fix the problems found. Going >>back to an older version, and just because it builds, doesn't guarantee it's >>going to work any better either. >> >>I've got more faith in the current DRM CVS as people are actively working >>on it, rather than using an older snapshot that people could be unwilling >>to go back and fix if a problem was found. > >I'd like to see a version that is proven to build, work, and fit in with >our requirements before making any final decision on this. The snapshot >we currently have imported is clearly not a good one. > >Otherwise, going back to the version of the kernel modules that we shipped >with 4.4.0 won't be too difficult, especially if the user-mode side has >the level of backward compatibility that people have claimed. Is there any update on this? David _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
