> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Ben RUBSON <ben.rub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 04 Nov 2016, at 19:13, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@richardelling.com >> <mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:11 AM, MrRakeshsank . <rksh.s...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:rksh.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> any one has any ideas on it? Thanks! >> >> Why would you want a "logical size" quota as opposed to the currently >> implemented >> "allocation size" quota? > > I admit I would be interested in this feature too : a user needs 10GB, > you give him 10GB through a "logical" quota, > and as a storage admin you enable compression to better handle your storage, > being able to address more users, then reducing costs. > Interesting :)
indeed :-) But while this simple example might work for a compression-only environment, its core concepts are utterly destroyed snapshots, clones, and dedup are used. A better idea is to bill for logical size, constrain with allocation size. — richard ------------------------------------------- openzfs-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
