-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/217/#review728
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- George Wilson


On May 8, 2015, 3:29 a.m., Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.csiden.org/r/217/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2015, 3:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing List and Matthew Ahrens.
> 
> 
> Repository: illumos-gate
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Do not put zfsvfs_t on the stack. Its size of 7656 bytes consumes too much 
> stack. Allocate it
> temporarily instead.
> 
> On FreeBSD the kernel stack size is 16384. Issuing 'zpool create' command 
> builds a kernel
> stack consisting of at least 36 frames, with zfs_create_fs() somewhere in the 
> middle. If
> kernel is compiled with -O0, then stack will be exhausted and kernel panics. 
> The default
> compilation option is -O2, and it doesn't panic yet. But still putting extra 
> 7656 bytes
> is risky. If any of the 36 functions is modified to consume a bit more stack, 
> we will panic
> on the default kernel.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_znode.c 
> 4664899d13f86f556b71aaca6949448ffd45b0eb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/217/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> With the patch, FreeBSD 11-CURRENT compiled with -O0 doesn't panic on 'zpool 
> create'.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gleb Smirnoff
> 
>

_______________________________________________
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to