On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:46:23 -0500, Chris wrote:
On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pan...@nexenta.com> wrote:
6713 is somewhat more involved, I've tried to use the wording from the 4390 fix
and describe the current (ie, with the tunable being unset) behavior, but most
likely it could be improved.
+background destroy operations will continue to free the space, without leaks.
Maybe “will continue to free the leaked space”? (assuming the “leaked” value
that recovers will shift to the “freeing” property value)
Thanks, Chris.
I've updated the wording a bit, see if you like it better.
-------------------------------------------
openzfs-developer
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
