LGTM. — Chris Josephes
> On Apr 2, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pan...@nexenta.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:46:23 -0500, Chris wrote: >> >>> On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pan...@nexenta.com> wrote: >>> 6713 is somewhat more involved, I've tried to use the wording from the 4390 >>> fix and describe the current (ie, with the tunable being unset) behavior, >>> but most likely it could be improved. >> >> +background destroy operations will continue to free the space, without >> leaks. >> >> Maybe “will continue to free the leaked space”? (assuming the “leaked” value >> that recovers will shift to the “freeing” property value) > > Thanks, Chris. > > I've updated the wording a bit, see if you like it better. > ------------------------------------------- openzfs-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
