2009/9/2 Timothy Green <[email protected]>: > In that case, would it make sense for me to start a collaborative google doc > for converting the first phase specification into tasks in a Django-specific > language?
It would be useful. On the other hand, Phase 1 apparently doesn't amount to much more than "collect email addresses by constituency derived from postcodes", so I don't think it's absolutely necessary just yet. Seb > Seb Bacon wrote: >>> >>> Do you have any intention for a specific language/framework? From there, >>> specification can be divided up into independent tasks. Also seconding >>> the >>> github/google code point. >>> >> >> I've recently starting doing stuff with Django. I would probably use >> that. >> >> Regardless of framework, I strongly prefer python. >> >> However, it's more important that it doesn't all rely on me, as my >> availability is very on-off. So, if anyone is interested in helping >> and doesn't know python or objects to Django, now's the time to say. >> >> On reflection, I agree with Matthew about a map not being a good idea. >> I don't see what it achieves, apart from looking pretty; which would >> be fine, if it were not for the fact it would also be misleading. >> >> Seb >> >> 2009/9/2 > > -- skype: seb.bacon mobile: 07790 939224 _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
