Sorry for the lack context ... The ECF list has lots of e-advocacy folks in the UK on it.
One member's partner is running for parliament and he noted that they have received some 250 candidate question surveys since the election was called instead of before. So these are not push/pull surveys for the public. I've always been interested in what questions interest groups are putting before candidates and how candidates are answering. Despite the stronger party line approach in the UK, interest groups are actually asking candidates one by one their views on a number of issues. What good are all the questions and answers if hardly anyone sees them? Steven Clift http://stevenclift.com @democracy On Apr 16, 2010 12:26 PM, "Timothy Green" <[email protected]> wrote: Just to understand the psychology of it - do you look more favourably on doing surveys which aren't push-polling, or do you feel it's not worth the time to distinguish the two? -t On 16/04/10 17:16, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > On Thursday 15 April 2010 18:52:48 Timothy Green... _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] A...
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
