On 22 June 2011 09:10, Seb Bacon <[email protected]> wrote: > One to keep an eye on: http://www.openwatch.net/about/ > > Not sure how it'll shake out, e.g. provenance of recordings, > searchability of archive. But it could be a good start. >
I had a look at the site and a couple of examples, a few things possibly worth noting: * The examples are US, not UK, so it would be reasonable to presume that the site overall is US focused. * The use of language is consistent with that used by far right libertarian wingnuts. * No evidence as to true provenance or accuracy of recordings, could be very easily faked. In fact I'd say that I think it's more likely that the DUI refusal was faked than that the first thing a driver would think to do before pulling over at a drunk driving check is to start recording. * Links to supposed in depth analysis seem to be to the same site and use the same language so no apparent diversity of views and paradigms. Stephen -- It's better to ask a silly question than to make a silly assumption. http://stephensorablog.blogspot.com/ | http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenboothuk | Skype: stephenbooth_uk Apparently I'm a "Eierlegende Woll-Milch-Sau", I think it was meant as a compliment. _______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
