Whats wrong with fishing expeditions?

If docs can be released under FoI, they should really be freely
available  already... A department is (IMV) already at fault if they
have to be asked for documents...


On 22 December 2011 20:01, Michael Bimmler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Mark Goodge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I predict that it will be refused, on DPA and/or cost grounds. The
>> sender/recipient lines will identify individuals. As a general rule, emails
>> released under FOI either are purely internal, or have identifiers of
>> external senders/recipients redacted. The content of several individual
>> emails will themselves be subject to DPA if they refer to identifiable
>> individuals. And redacting a lot of emails will certainly be somthing that
>> the cost can be applied to.
>>
>> On a more general note, I think this kind of fishing expedition is precisely
>> the sort of thing that brings FOI into disrepute and increases the
>> probability of legislative changes to further restrict its scope.
>
> very much agree with your general point on the undesirability of
> fishing expeditions etc.
>
> Out of curiosity  though: if I'm not completely mistaken, costs can
> only be applied to retrieving and collating information, but not to
> considering exemptions and applying redactions. In that case I can't
> quite see how they could refuse on cost grounds. (DPA still holds
> though)
>  Am I wrong on this? (Arguably it would be desirable to consider the
> cost of redactions in calculating the cost for the cost threshold
> exemption, but I thought they weren't included at present)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> developers-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/paul%40idltd.com

_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to