The Information Commissioner ruled in a case concerning South Yorkshire
Police that redaction CANNOT be taken into account in relation to time or
cost:

http://www.out-law.com/page-10615
On Dec 22, 2011 8:03 PM, "Michael Bimmler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Mark Goodge <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I predict that it will be refused, on DPA and/or cost grounds. The
> > sender/recipient lines will identify individuals. As a general rule,
> emails
> > released under FOI either are purely internal, or have identifiers of
> > external senders/recipients redacted. The content of several individual
> > emails will themselves be subject to DPA if they refer to identifiable
> > individuals. And redacting a lot of emails will certainly be somthing
> that
> > the cost can be applied to.
> >
> > On a more general note, I think this kind of fishing expedition is
> precisely
> > the sort of thing that brings FOI into disrepute and increases the
> > probability of legislative changes to further restrict its scope.
>
> very much agree with your general point on the undesirability of
> fishing expeditions etc.
>
> Out of curiosity  though: if I'm not completely mistaken, costs can
> only be applied to retrieving and collating information, but not to
> considering exemptions and applying redactions. In that case I can't
> quite see how they could refuse on cost grounds. (DPA still holds
> though)
>  Am I wrong on this? (Arguably it would be desirable to consider the
> cost of redactions in calculating the cost for the cost threshold
> exemption, but I thought they weren't included at present)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> developers-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>
> Unsubscribe:
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/colm%40truthmonkey.org
>
_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to