> On 6 Jan 2016, at 10:18 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I am curious to know why GPL was chosen as the license for fence-agents, and > other ClusterLabs open-source works. As a follow-up question, was the Apache > v3 license considered, and if so why was it not chosen?
I think you’ll find that the apache licenses didn’t exist at the point GPL was chosen > I am working with another open-source project that would like to use > fence-agents but the GPL license does not play well with our Apache v3 > license. I don’t see why, you should be able to call GPL “binaries” without being infected. > My ideal solution would be to have fence-agents move to Apache v3, but I know > that's asking a lot. I’d be surprised if this happened but don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other. > > Thanks! > > -Ollie > > > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
