On 24/03/16 17:18 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 22/03/16 19:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> On 18/03/16 16:16 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >>>> So I move to change it to GPLv2+, for everything that is a "program", >>>> and LGPLv2.1 for everything that may be viewed as a library. >>>> >>>> At least that's how I will correct the wording in the >>>> affected files in the heartbeat mercurial. >>> >>> In the light of the presented historic excursion, that feels natural. >>> >>> Assuming no licensors want to speak up, the question now stands: >>> Is it the same conclusion that has been reached by booth and sbd >>> package maintainers (Dejan and Andrew respectively, if I follow what's >>> authoritative nowadays properly) and are these willing to act on it to >>> prevent the mentioned ambiguous interpretation once forever? >> >> Yes, that's all fine with me. >> >>> I will be happy to provide actual patches, >> >> Even better :) > > Added the "maint: clarify GPLv2.1+ -> GPLv2+ in the license notices" > (e294fa2) commit into https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/23 > if that's OK with you, Dejan.
I hope we are all on the same page as Andrew went ahead there (thanks). Alas, I've noticed there were some subtleties neglected in there so, with regrets, a separate (and hopefully final) pull request: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/booth/pull/24 -- Jan (Poki)
pgpvGDEwkecNJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
