On 21/03/16 22:03 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 18/03/16 16:16 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> So I move to change it to GPLv2+, for everything that is a "program", >> and LGPLv2.1 for everything that may be viewed as a library. >> >> At least that's how I will correct the wording in the >> affected files in the heartbeat mercurial. > > In the light of the presented historic excursion, that feels natural. > > Assuming no licensors want to speak up, the question now stands: > Is it the same conclusion that has been reached by booth and sbd > package maintainers (Dejan and Andrew respectively, if I follow what's > authoritative nowadays properly) and are these willing to act on it to > prevent the mentioned ambiguous interpretation once forever? > > I will be happy to provide actual patches, but that's not a decision > for me to take. > > In fact, Andrew has already expressed his inclination: > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/developers/2016-March/000182.html
Here we go to address this in sbd: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/sbd/pull/3 -- Jan (Poki)
pgpKN0x64mRXU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
