On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:08:19PM -0600, David Teigland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:34:31PM -0600, Chris Feist wrote: > > lvm2: > > Good - It's obvious it's a newer/better version of the lvm agent. > > Bad - It may be associated with the lvm2 commands which we are working on > > phasing out. > > Unfortunately, the lvm project used the name "lvm2" to mean something > different, so giving a new meaning to the "lvm" vs "lvm2" distinction > would be confusing.
If nobody else finds this confusing, then don't let this get in the way of doing lvm2. > lvmvg or lvmlv or lvm_vg/lvm_lv I don't mind these. Another idea is "lvm_agent", "lvm_ra". I don't have a strong opinion about any of them. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
