Hello,
What about VolumeGroup (in the tradition of Filesystem, for instance)?
In the LVM-activate, we will support both all VG activation and only one
specified LV
activation depending on the parameters.
Or why not shoot for an LVM merge (plus proper versioning to tell
the difference)?
You mean merging LVM-activate with the existing LVM? Here was a long
discussion about that:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/1040
Thanks,
Eric
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
